Re: Try to do the math, yanker tards.

"Raymond O'Hara" <raymond-ohara@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:kM6dnWsu-vHJSdvVnZ2dnUVZ_o7inZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Dan C" <youmustbejoking@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:pan.2008.06.04.15.41.05.687597@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Wed, 04 Jun 2008 15:15:06 +0000, theBZA wrote:
>>
>>>> While I'm certainly no Yank fan, you're a moron.  The correct math
>>>> involved with those numbers is 300%, dimwit.  The number "9" is three
>>>> times as big as the number "3", which makes it 300%.
>>
>>> Not again. 9 is most definitely *not* 300% better than 3. If it were,
>>> then 3 would be 100% better than 3. 3 is not better than 3. Learn some
>>> math.
>>
>> Damn, you're even dumber than the other moron.  Look again, dimwit.  I
>> didn't use the word "better", I said "bigger".  The number 9 is 300% of
>> the number 3, simple as that.
>>
>> Your statement of "3 would be 100% better than 3" just doesn't even
make
>> sense.  3 is equal to 3, doofus.  Bugger off and STFU.  You shouldn't 
>> have
>> dropped out at 4th grade.
>
> we have this discussion monthly.
> they don't understand math.
>

This may be the first time BZA and I are on the same page...