"McBain" <scottham.list@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:05c38936-7db5-41ce-a6c8-d98276f28397@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Feb 10, 5:04 pm, "Likely_Story" <Tru_Dat@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Bill Kawalec" <billkawa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:w8qdnevvCukaxDLanZ2dnUVZ_hOdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> > "McBain" <scottham.l...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>news:c91e461f-f289-4ce2-b5a0-29080e5713c6@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Feb 10, 4:50 am, "Bill Kawalec" <billkawa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> tell ya what; I lost interest as soon as I saw that line in the "bio"
> >> about
> >> believeing that team chemistry being a myth...
> >> yikes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> > Well, given a choice between a team with lots of talent or lots of
> > chemistry, I'll take talent.
>
> > **********************
>
> > mid to late '80s Toronto Blue Jays.
> > 'nuff said.
>
> Ummmm......Bill. You are arguing with a spamming whore.
> That is what spamming whores want. Attention.
>
> ;-)
>
> Though I do find myself in quite a few flames with another spamming
whore
> from time to time.
Actually, I'm a regular in the Yankee newsgroup. I haven't done a
bulk posting for my blog before last night and probably won't do it
again. It would be nice to get some people to read it, but if people
aren't into it, what can you do?
******
oh good!! If chemistry is a ""myth,"" then you tell me why your MFYs lost
in
'06!
I'll be waiting.
As far as looking for attention, I'm looking for conversation and was
responding to the chemistry comment. I didn't post anything
imflammatory to incite comment. The chemistry comment was based on my
site and not on my post.
If Bill doesn't want to have a conversation then I'm not sure why he
responded.
|
