"Hosmerica" <BigOneComing@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:F5ydnQAejZDZeijanZ2dnUVZ_veinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Bill Kawalec" <billkawalec@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:mcadnSCYpKLUfSjanZ2dnUVZ_uyinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> "Matt" <AcesWired@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
news:6ea2828a-8250-4063-bbcb-32d8a2ac7329@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Feb 14, 7:46 pm, "Bill Kawalec" <billkawa...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>> btw, the 2007 WS Champion Red Sox were a combined 25-11 vs Baltimore
and
>>> Tampa Bay, while fini****ng two games under .500 vs their two nearest
>>> rivals
>>> in the division....
>>
>> Gotta love a guy who thinks allegory is a good argument in this case.
>> Also gotta love a guy who doesn't understand the difference between
>> "more im****tant" and "all-im****tant."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *************************
>> It's hilarious how people can just go on thinking their theory is
really
>> ""profound,"" when, year after year, the actual numbers prove it to be
>> just a load of crap.
>> 1) All that matters at the end of Septemeber is your win totaly.
>> 2) Champion****ps are won by beating up on the lesser teams.
>
>
>
> Christ, Bill, which ****ing way do you want it? You don't like other
> people bringing up "numbers" to prove a point, but now you selectively
> want to use "numbers" to show how un-""profound"" someone's theory is by
> using "numbers"???
I just love when people totally miss the concept.
WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
>
|
